Not a Swedish Joke
a wall street journal editorial
August 25, 2005
If you find yourself in Malmo, Sweden, and happen to see a homosexual, an imam and a gypsy walk into a bar, it's not a joke. These are just some of the people who can be borrowed -- yes, borrowed -- from the local library for a 45-minute chat in a nearby pub as part of an effort to fight discrimination.
Ullah Brohed pioneered the "Living Library" project earlier this month. "You sometimes hear people's prejudices and you realize that they are just uninformed," she says. And since a library exists to educate, she decided to give Swedish bigots the opportunity to come face to face with the prejudice of their choice. The Malmo library also offers a Danish man (since some Swedes and Danes don't get along too well) and, to our great embarrassment, even a journalist. "Maybe not all journalists are know-it-all and sensationalist," Ms. Brohed says.
Inspired by this example, a library in the Dutch city of Almelo plans to start its own human lending program next month. "The customers can rent a veiled Muslim woman and finally ask her all the questions they would never dare to ask if they met her on the street," says the director, Jan Krol. Of course, Mr. Krol must adopt his offerings to local tastes. So apart from the usual suspects -- a gay man, a Muslim and a gypsy -- there will also be a politician, a hard-drug user, a gay woman and a German (that World War II episode).
Given the daily reports of widespread anti-Americanism in Europe, we are surprised that neither Mr. Krol nor Ms. Brohed has a Yank in stock. Should Americans ever become available in libraries in, say, Paris or Berlin, even Jacques Chirac and Gerhard Schröder could check them out.
2 comments:
I kind of like this idea. It certainly provides an opportunity to ask questions and learn about someone that you might not actually encounter in your everyday life. You can still hold the same opinion and views as you did before meeting them, just now you will at least be informed instead of ignorant which is a much better way to provide an opinion or view that is worth listening to and reflecting on.
Why is no one saying anything about the fact that a person is not a book? Books are different in that they don't get to change their mind. Their information and analysis should be so that it remains timeless, whereas a person is always changing and adding new ideas, throwing antiquated ones out. Everything must be so forced -interactive these days. If you want to learn about someone, why don't we just talk to each other?
Not sure why I feel so strongly about this...really I just wanted to stop in and say hey Cam. Where've you been lately?
Post a Comment